Essay about Lears Character Development in Shakespeares...

Lears Character Development in Shakespeares King Lear Though King Lear, of Shakespeares play, King Lear, wrongs both Cordelia and Kent in his harsh treatment against them, the unjust actions of Regan and Goneril against King Lear cause him to be a man more sinned against than sinning (3.2.60-61). In order to relieve himself of the problems and work associated with holding his position so he can unburdened crawl toward death, King Lear, of pre-Christ Britain, divides up his kingdom into three portions, one for each of his daughters (1.1.41). To decide the daughter to whom he should give the largest portion of the kingdom, King Lear holds a competition that merely serves to feed his ego. He requires each daughter to publicly†¦show more content†¦When the Earl of Kent attempts to stand up for Cordelia and point out the rashness of King Lears actions, he banishes him, too. Neither Cordelia or Kent deserved such severe and unforgiving punishment – in fact, they deserved no punishment at all, as they did nothing wrong. Despite King Lears horrendous actions against both Cordelia and Kent, neither of these characters takes revenge on him. In fact, Cordelia eventually forgives King Lear and Kent comes back to Britain and serves the king in disguise. After splitting up the nation between his two remaining daughters, King Lear keeps one hundred knights for himself, and requests a place to stay. It only seems fitting that King Lear stay at Gonerils and Regans homes, since they owe their possession of those homes and their power to their father. Regan and Goneril quickly turn on their father, kicking him out of their homes, and leaving him to die in one of the worst storms they have seen. Though the actions of Regan and Goneril mirror the kings, in that they banish King Lear, just as he banishes Cordelia and Kent, their sin against their father is worse than his sin against Cordelia and Kent. King Lear bases his daughters love on superficial characteristics, he banishes Kent and Cordelia – his own daughter – and clings to his pride, not desiring to give up the title King even after he has yielded his power to hisShow MoreRelated The Importance of the First Two Scenes in King Lear1568 Words   |  7 PagesThe Importance of the First Two Scenes in King Lear      Ã‚  Ã‚   King Lear, as I see it, confronts the perplexity and mystery of human action. (Shakespeares Middle Tragedies, 169)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   As the previous quotation from the scriptures of Maynard Mack implies, King Lear is a very complex and intricate play which happens to be surrounded by a lot of debate.   The folio of 1623, which was, as is well known, edited by two of Shakespeares fellow actors (Notes and Essays on Shakespeare, 242)Read MoreA Comparison Between the Plots of King Lear and Much Ado about Nothing910 Words   |  4 Pagescloser look at the plots of King Lear and Much Ado about Nothing. There are both similarities and differences in King Lear’s and Much Ado about Nothing’s plots in the rising action, climax, and resolution. Initially, There are both similarities and differences in King Lear’s and Much Ado about Nothing’s plots in the rising action. In both cases, you aren’t given much time upon beginning until situations start to escalate. Now, before I say anything about King Lear’s plot, I’d like to point outRead MoreEssay The Foolishness of Fools in Shakespeares King Lear1706 Words   |  7 PagesThe Foolishness of Fools in Shakespeares King Lear Shakespeares tragedy King Lear is comprised of many distinct themes. His contrasts of light and dark, good and evil, and his brilliant illustration of parallels between the foolishness of the plays characters and society allowed him to craft a masterpiece. Just as well, Shakespeares dynamic use of linguistic techniques such as pun and irony aid this illustration of the perfect microcosm, not only of 16th century Britain, but of all timesRead MoreKing Lear: Shakespeare’s almost Tragic Figure A tragic figure is often defined as an individual1400 Words   |  6 PagesKing Lear: Shakespeare’s almost Tragic Figure A tragic figure is often defined as an individual that is of noble birth, such as a king or other member of nobility. The individuals around them always respect them, however, they are often responsible for their own downfall, which will eventually lead to their death. Although the play King Lear can be considered one of William Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies, the character King Lear himself, lacks the ability to bring forth feelings of pity withinRead MoreKing Lear Character Development Essay1662 Words   |  7 PagesKing Lear is understandably one of William Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies, it encompasses the journey through suffering and explores, in detail, the idea of justice. Each character in the play experience s one or the other throughout the progression of the plot, it is evident that through compositional features such as these, the play write is trying to convey this meaning. Through methods such as intense imagery, motifs, repetition of words and rhym ing the play write has given intensity to certainRead MoreA Consideration of the Way Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Theme of Blindness in King Lear1563 Words   |  7 PagesA Consideration of the Way Shakespeare Presents and Develops the Theme of Blindness in King Lear Introduction ============ Throughout ‘King Lear’, Shakespeare uses the play’s characters to make judgements on society using blindness as a metaphor that runs through the play. He does this in a number of ways portraying characters that can be fooled by others’ flattery, or are easily manipulated or deceived, or simply have a lack of wisdom. As well as the horrific Read MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1469 Words   |  6 Pagessee, helping them understand the main plot better. One of Shakespeare’s plays, King Lear, has a subplot which shows the concepts of family bonds and identity. Shakespeare starts out the play with the subplot to show the audience that it is vital to know their part of the story to see the resolution of the main plot. The purpose of the subplot is to strengthen the purpose of the main characters’ lives in order to show the reader Shakespeare’s argument of humanity. The audience is quickly introducedRead MoreAnalysis of the Hero in King Lear1454 Words   |  6 Pages King Lear, a tragedy in which Shakespeare exhibits most fully his literary complexities, is surprisingly the least popular of the famous four. In spite of this, it is indefinitely the most talked about. For many this is Shakespeares most profound tragedy, one of the greatest plays ever written in any language at any time. It throws up questions, which remain as perplexing now as they were to Shakespeares earlier critics. And although thoroughly studied, the original story line has remained unchangedRead MoreThe Role of the Fool in King Lear Essay2177 Words   |  9 PagesAlison Dew Explore the role of the fool in King Lear. In Elizabethan times, the role of a fool, or court jester, was to professionally entertain others, specifically the king. In essence, fools were hired to make mistakes. Fools may have been mentally retarded youths kept for the court’s amusement, or more often they were singing, dancing stand up comedians. In William Shakespeare’s King Lear the fool plays many important roles. When Cordelia, Lear’s only well-intentioned daughter, is banishedRead MoreRole Of A Fool Or Jester During Elizabethan Times1351 Words   |  6 Pagesespecially the King. The fool would sing, dance, make jokes and make a fool of himself. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, the fool has many roles. When Lear banishes Cordelia from his kingdom, the fool in a way takes on Cordelia s role. He is not only a fool, but through his sarcasm and irony, he becomes the king s loyal advocate by pointing out the king’s shortcomings. The fool is the only one who is able to criticize the king of his s hortcomings without consequences and is able to abate the king s behavior

Analysis Of The Poem The Before They Pass Away

Alexis Giovinazzo Cultural Anthropology March 9th, 2014 Midterm Essay 1: The â€Å"Before They Pass Away† project is led by photographer Jimmy Nelson who travelled the world and documented various indigenous cultures between 2010 and 2013. His project is relatively controversial and is intended to spark conversation about these cultures, as well as remain as a resource over time. Photography can be written off as lacking intimacy and understanding of a society, yet Nelson attempts to go further in his relationship with his subjects, and form what he calls â€Å"intimate and unique friendships†. The photo projects, while representing Nelson’s positionality, leave the opportunity for viewers interpretations and personal understanding to be developed. In Wade Davis’s review of Jared Diamond’s book, he discusses the idea which Diamond proposes, that culture is derived from â€Å"environmental imperatives†. The Himba Tribe is described by Nelson as â€Å"tall, slender and statuesque herders† living in â€Å"one of the most extreme environments on earth.† Diamond would argue that their culture is a direct reflection of the environment they live in. Davis disagrees with this point and believes that culture is affected by more than just climate. Davis believes that these indigenous societies are important to remind us of alternate ways of life. Davis finds the idea between traditional and modern societies important in its ability to highlight different ways of living, and not a way for us to lookShow MoreRelated An Analysis of Ballad of the Harp-Weaver Essay915 Words   |  4 PagesAn Analysis of Ballad of the Harp-Weaver Take just a second to read the first eight lines very carefully. Picture yourself as a small child being with your mother or father sitting on their lap as they hold you. It is a good feeling that brings warmth and security to any child or any adult needing to recapture the essence of their childhood. In the first four lines we are to understand that the boys mother is trying to rub his skin to make him warm. That is what chafe means, to warmRead MoreOverview of The Consolation Essay795 Words   |  4 Pagesfor intellectuals.) 3. Boethius relies substantially on Platonic and Neoplatonic thought. If you are familiar with the ideas of Plato, look for echoes here. Notes and Questions Book I Poem 1 through Prose 5: Boethius complaint to Philosophy. He tells her about his unhappiness. Poem 1. The poem reflects Boethius complaint: a hopeless, self-absorbed grief, because Fortune has turned against him. Prose 1. Boethius says that entertainment is not a medicine for sorrow. Is he right orRead More Poetic Analysis of Fern Hill Essay960 Words   |  4 PagesPoetic Analysis Fern Hill Dylan Thomass poem Fern Hill represents the passage of one mans life from boyhood to adulthood and the realization of his mortality. The speaker in this poem uses expressive language and imagery to depict a tale of growing up. The use of colour adds life and character to people and abstract ideas. He looks up to Time (313) as an authority figure who has strict control of his life, and with descriptions of biblical figures we can presume that he is aRead MorePerspectives of Love in Thomas Wyatts They Flee From Me, and Edmund Spencers Amoretti1100 Words   |  5 Pagesinterpreted in many ways but mainly in a form known as sad and heartbreaking experiences. During the sixteenth century and times before that, many authors expressed love as gloomy and also wrote in the favor of men. Two interesting portrayals of love are in the sonnet â€Å"They Flee From Me† by Thomas Wyatt and collection of sonnets â€Å"Amoretti† by Edmund Spencer. In these poems, love is described mostly in two opposite ways. While â€Å"They Flee From Me† portrays men as the victim to women and their deviousnessRead MoreLife of Edgar Allen Poe from Immigration to Poet1035 Words   |  5 Pages1800s though the 1850s. During this period of time there was a mass movement of European Immigration to the Uni ted States (Educating About Immigration). On the Statue of Liberty, which is located in The New York Harbor which many immigrants had to pass through, the words â€Å"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free†¦Ã¢â‚¬  this quotation gave immigrants hope while entering the new land (Educating About Immigration). Immigrants made great contributions to the United StatesRead More Literary Analysis of Emily Dickinsons Poetry Essays1053 Words   |  5 PagesLiterary Analysis of Emily Dickinsons Poetry   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Emily Dickinson is one of the most famous authors in American History, and a good amount of that can be attributed to her uniqueness in writing. In Emily Dickinsons poem Because I could not stop for Death, she characterizes her overarching theme of Death differently than it is usually described through the poetic devices of irony, imagery, symbolism, and word choice.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Emily Dickinson likes to use many different forms of poetic devicesRead MoreAnalysis Of Emily Dickinson s I Heard A Fly Buzz When I 929 Words   |  4 Pagesis something all human beings will come to deal with one day. It doesn’t matter when or who it is, one could be young, middle-aged, or old. One could be born into wealth, royalty, or poverty. In a perfect world everyone would live to old age and pass away in their sleep, but this isn’t a perfect world and the reality is that death could come at any moment, whether one is ready or not. Many people fear death as it means an end to everything they’ve done in their life while others see it as the nextRead MoreTupac Poem Summary 2morrow Essay1045 Words   |  5 PagesPoet: Tupac Shakur Poem: And 2Morrow Critical Analysis Tupac Shakur is one of the most legendary and popular poetic/rap artists to this day. He is considered to be one of the most influential people of his time, influencing every African-American citizen in North America. Thought of as the creator of rap, Tupac has sold over seventy-five million albums worldwide although his career ended as quickly as it started. Six, is the number of years Tupac spent making rap professionally. ThirteenRead MoreNothing: Poetry and Persona1579 Words   |  7 Pagesthan  patience   a kind of thoroughness   I couldn’t see before.      I shall not let it pass.   My father,   this undoing is  what binds us. CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE POEM â€Å"BREAKING THROUGH† The poem Breaking Through written by Myrna Peňa-Reyes is very profound in terms of its appeal to the reader. The poem is all about the filial relationship between a son/daughter and a father. The poem basically revolves around the father and his son/daughter. The plot of the poem tells the reader that a certain persona in theRead MoreLast night Sharon Olds Essay1348 Words   |  6 Pagestogether, I close my eyes when I remember. I hardly knew myself, like something twisting and twisting out of a chrysalis, enormous, without language, all head, all shut eyes, and the humming like madness, the way they writhe away, and do not leave, back, back, away, back. Did I know you? No kiss, no tenderness–more like killing, death-grip holding to life, genitals like violent hands clasped tight barely moving, more like being closed in a great jaw and eaten, and the screaming I groan

Love Canal Essay Research Paper May 15 free essay sample

Love Canal Essay, Research Paper May 15, 2001 Love Canal There are some of import legal facets to the Love Canal instance. Many civil actions or civil wrongs were brought against Hooker/Occidental during and after the Love Canal incident. By nineteen-eighty, Occidental faced over two billion dollars in cases chiefly from Love Canal but besides from misdemeanors in other parts of the state. Assetss would be sold off and all the people would merely acquire a small spot of money and the authorities would be stuck with the killing. This two billion dollar figure includes all the punitory harm instances brought about by persons every bit good as the cases filed by the federal, province, and metropolis functionaries. Much of these figures were intentionally inflated so when they were negotiated down the complainants would still acquire a sensible sum of money. This figure besides included both punitory and compensatory amendss. The tribunals finally found that Occidental was apt for merely compensatory amendss. We will write a custom essay sample on Love Canal Essay Research Paper May 15 or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Occidental was non held accountable for punitory amendss because a federal tribunal justice found that they had non acted with # 8220 ; reckless or motiveless neglect of safety or rights # 8221 ; . This is one of the criterions that must be proved along with carelessness to go on with punitory harm cases. This determination besides lowered the sum of the cases well so Occidental could afford to pay some of the amendss. Companies are usually held to strict liability when it comes excessively toxic dumping. This means if the chemicals are at that place illicitly than it is the company who is responsible for them. In this instance the company is at least partially responsible but the school board and metropolis of Niagara Falls besides acted negligently. Why so weren # 8217 ; t they sued every bit good? The reply lies in the deep pockets theory of civil wrongs. This theory says action the biggest company with the most money. Since toxic dumping is held in rigorous cubic decimeter iability, Hooker admitted seting the chemicals at that place, and they have a batch of money, they were the perfect mark for all the immense cases that followed. Another of import legal construct involved in this instance is the slippery incline thought. This is an of import incentive for authorities bureaus like the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) , to modulate pollutants and force companies in misdemeanor to clean up their act. This construct fundamentally says if you give an inch they take a stat mi. It is of import to travel after big companies and do certain they are following the regulations and clean up their musss so that they don # 8217 ; t go environmental hogs dumping tuns of chemicals into our delicate environment. After old ages of judicial proceeding Occidental eventually paid the authorities 129 million dollars for killing of the Love Canal sight. They paid 102 million into the Superfund program and 27 million to the federal authorities on behalf of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. This was in compensation for the money the authorities spent in declaring Love Canal a province of exigency. One legal loophole that is non widely publicized is that for the money put into the Superfund program by Occidental 64.5 million could be given back to them in the signifier of a revenue enhancement recognition. This involves legal maneuvering to acquire Occidental to settle the instance taking a batch of political emphasis. And the authorities will acquire some money to assist the clean up. Throughout this instance there was a batch of legal maneuvering every bit good as political force per unit area put on the legal system. It was an emotionally charged instance with multiple parties responsible for the love canal catastrophe but at the clip the dangers were non every bit clear as they are now. It # 8217 ; s a batch easier to look back and knock than it is to do the best determinations as one goes along. Regulative bureaus like the EPA and FEMA are so of import in protecting Americans from companies in misdemeanor of environmental Torahs.

The Rules Of Statutory Interpretation †Free Solution - Click Now!

Question: With reference to the rules of statutory interpretation and the doctrine of binding precedent, to what extent do UK judges trespass on the proper function of Government and the Legislature when exercising their legal decision-making functions? Answer: Introduction: The theory of separation of power exists in the system of United Kingdom. Separation of power means the three organs of the Government that is legislature, execute and judiciary must work independently. No department will overlap the function of other. The legislature has the duty to make the law, executive will apply those laws and Judiciary will interpret those laws. The judiciary played a vital role of interpreting the law. On that occasion some time judiciary will apply its mind to find out the best possible way to interpret the law. But in this process some time judges will apply the according to the need of the case. The rule is that judiciary will interpret the law according to the intention with which the legislators prepare the law. But using the principle of statutory interpretation the judges in UK some time apply the law according their own view that is direct overlapping between the function of two organ of government. Principle of statutory interpretation: This is a process in which judges of the court construe and relate the legislations. The interpretation of the statute is essential the case involves any piece or part of the specific Act. If the meaning of the legislation is unambiguous and strait then the interpretations are also plain and simple but if the meaning are vague and involves lots of ambiguity then the judges have to play more responsible role in interpreting the statute. For finding the connotation of the particular statue judges have various instrument in that regard like statutory interpretation, lawmaking history, and finding the purpose of the legislation. Injurisdictions of common law, the courtsmay perhaps concern about the rules of legislative elucidation to those laws endorsed by theparliamentor by the authority in exercise of delegated legislationin cases of executiverules. The work of the judiciary is to interprets the legislations in a way so that in can be applicable for any particular case. No legislation is called to be so unambiguous that it can fit for each and every case. There are various reasons for the ambiguity like the words of the legislation are not so clear to understand the intention, or the legislation is not competent to fulfill all the requirements of the case like technical advancement and all, or doubts attached to the law from the time of enactment. For all these mentioned matters statutory interpretation is required. There is a principle that the parliament is ultimate in case of making regulation and the courts are just acted as analyst of those regulations. However in reality while executing the role of interpreter the judges can formulate comprehensive alteration in the execution of the Act. If there are conflicts between the sources of law: The rule of statutory interpretation will be applicable where there are conflicts between the Acts and the precedential case laws. It is assumed that legislation will be predominant over the precedential case laws by the court. This is called as parliamentary supremacy in United Kingdom. Rule of Ejusdem Generis: The whole statute must be considered as a whole. If a part is inconsistent then that part must be interpreted in the light of the whole statute. A law cannot be construed in an attempt to be incompatible with other prevail laws. Wherever there is an irregularity the judges must give effort to supply a harmonious construction on that scenario. There are main three rules in regard to statutory interpretation. They are plain meaning rule, golden rule and mischief rule of construction. The plain meaning rule means the statutes must be interpreted in simple way according to its meaning. In the case of Sussex Peerage Case the decision was come out that the interpretation must be done according to the intention of the law maker which reflects from the legislation. When the statues are clear cut in meaning there is no need to incorporate any kind of construction which can change the meaning of the statute. In the case ofWhiteley v. Chappel, gave a verdict that the person named as Whiteley could not be imprisoned under the clause that every individual is allowed to take part in an election, for the reason that the individual whom he includes was a deceased person. By means of a factual interpretation of the applicable legislative stipulation that the dead man was not included in the term of an individual allowed to take part in an election. Obviously it is not the purpose of legislative body. Though, the above mentioned literal construction can only be applicable when the words are used in simple and plain form. Pepper v Hart was a land mark case in this regard. In this case the court allowed adding references in cases where there is absurdity attached o any legislation or not. The golden rule allows a judge to depart from a word's normal meaning in order to avoid anabsurdresult.The principle called golden rule originated near about in 1854 and involve a new range of modification in the rule of interpretation. This rule makes harmonious construction between the rule of lateral meaning and mischief rule. This rule generally advocates for the plain and simple meaning of the word of the legislature but whenever there is ambiguity judges will apply their mind to fix it up to the mark. In Becke v. Smith case Parke J commented that it is necessary and useful principle of interpretation to hold the normal meaning of the statute unless there is a discrepancy with the intention of the law makers. To remove irrationality the words statute can be varied or modified to remove the inconsistency. In Grey v. Pearson it was commented by Lord Wensleydale that in case of all the written legal document normal grammatical meaning must be incorporated. But if there in inconsistency or irregularity in the meaning then judges take step accordingly. The rule was applied inSigsworth, Re, Bedford v Bedford .In this case court decide that the matter by applying this rule. This principle was applied on the section 46 of theAdministration of Estates Act 1925. That particular Act wanted that the law court must apply the rule for someones power of inheritance in certain situations. The decision took by the court in this regard was that nobody ought to make any earnings from any criminal activity. The court wants to analysis the word issue in the light of the golden rule. A boy killed his own mother and then he commits suicide. The court was interested about the decision regarding the matter of inheritance. There were no arguments regarding the profit make out of any crime. The main objective of the mischief rule is to find the defect in the statute and remove it to implement it in a suitable manner. The court must implement the rule in that manner which can give the proper remedy. In Conway v Rimmer case court apply the statutory interpretation rule to discover the intention of the legislative body. In this application court raises some question that what are those hidden provisions which the law did not find or fail to cover. The law passed by the parliament now going to reviewed by the court. The Mischief Rule has much conservative submission than other two above mentioned rule. This rule applicable in that special circumstances where the court what to apply the statute to remove all the mischief. In this case the judges can took the help of the secondary sources also like parliamentary committee reports, law reviews etc to find out the intention of the legislature. This rule enhances the power of judges to decide he intention of the legislative body. In this case it can be seen that the parliamentary supremacy somehow not maintainable, the judges have more power to interpret the law to make it useable. The main advantages of this rule are that in case of common law jurisdictions like UK the presence of binding precedent principle has its effect on the rule of interpretation which helps to prevent misuse of the laws. Different law commissions of England also find it more useful that other rule of interpretation because it generally avoid ambiguous and vague results and more over its in conformity with parliamentary sovereignty. Heydon's Case, the most important andlandmark case. This mischief rule is also called as Heydon rule for this issue. It was the first case where themischief rulewas applied for the interpretation of statute. For this reason this case has its own flavor and significance towards the rule. Themischief regulationis extra bendable in order to application from theGolden rule and Literal connotation rule. In this mischief rule adjudicators are the main authority to examine the draw backs to make the proper analysis regarding the gap in the area covered by any particular statute. The ruling of this case was basically light upon the discussion and conflicts between the existing laws and pre existing common law. The judges of this case decide the matter and state that the object of a law was to remove the trouble occurring from the defect present in the common law. For that reason the court state that capacity of the statutes are inadequate so judges are required to interpret the law in quest of the actual intention of the legislators, or intention for the benefit of the public at large. In this case four questions are come into existence that what was the existing law before the said Act come into force? What was the proper or actual trouble and imperfection which the common law failed to cover and also discussed about the solution which parliament used to cure that problem and finally what was the real cause for that remedy. This case shows that though parliament is the highest authority in rule making but the judges also have the power to interpret it so that the defects in the law can be removes and the law can cover all the trouble occurred for that defect in statute. Principle of Binding precedent: Inthe systems of common law precedent has a greater value. Precedent generally means and includes that the decision of the higher court will be applicable to lower courts also.In general terms it can be said that in the same cause of action or in same related law if the higher court have any decision then it will be binding on the lower court also. Common lawlegal systems precedent has a greater value. Judges of the law courts are bound to follow the principle of binding precedent inthe jurisdiction of England. This is one of the distinguishing characteristics of the legal system in England. In the legal system of England the judiciary are not enjoys the right to construct their conclusion in relation to any progress or explanation of a statute. Lower courts may be obliged by a verdict decided in any preceding case. There are two crucial points in this regard. Firstly, the court must be in higher authority than the other court which is bound to maintain the precedent. Along with this the facts, scope, object or application of law of both the cases must be similar in nature between the two cases. Overlapping areas: If we consider the fact of constitution it is obvious that the judges are in subordinate position than the parliament. So judges are not in a position to challenge the validity of any of the decided laws enacted by the parliament. But the judges have the power to interpret the law in such a manner which will give effect to the he actual Act. Though there was a doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty but by interpreting the laws somehow they entered into the era of the legislature. In different cases as sighted above was shown that judges of different law courts apply their mind to cure the defect in the in the legislation and this power is amounts to trespassing to the power of the parliament itself. On the other hand the judges of the law court trespass to the authority of the executive also. The government means the executive enjoys the power of delegated legislation. But those delegated legislations are subject to judicial review. So in this case we easily understood that judiciary somehow restricts the power of executive also. In many cases if nay inconsistency occurs by any action of the executive the court will try the matter and pronounce the verdict. In case of the application of the principle of Sub Judice it was obvious that the parliament will not be able to discuss any matter in their session if that matter is pending on the court of law. In Jackson case the court determine the issue that there was always a restriction over the parliamentary supremacy if it involves any question of public good. Then the law court has the supreme authority interpret the case for the benefit of the public at large. Conclusion: By discussing the most prominent principle in UK that is the principle of binding precedent and the rule of statutory interpretation, it can be concluded that judges of UK to some extent encroaches in the domain of legislative and executive. The rights and duties are determined in the court of law. The legislations are effective to ensure those rights and duties but the court has the ultimate power to implement and utilize the meaning of the law as to the demand of the case. Executive cannot enjoy the arbitrary powers because their actions are also under the provisions of judicial review. In present era he law courts enjoys more power in interpreting the law and for the presence of the principle of binding precedent other courts also maintain that standard of interpretation. So the judiciary to some extent enters into the areas of the legislative and executive. I submitted the draft of this assignment. That draft was not up to the standard. It has problems in English like formation of sentence or grammatical errors. Now for this time I really work hard to meet the required standard. I read different articles and books from the library which are essential for this matter. My approach was not proper regarding the main issue. So I consult with my teacher and read different cases and books of jurisprudence and interpretation of statute. I am not citing all the resources in proper manner. Now for this time I learn the OSCOLA style of foot noting and implement it in proper way for referencing. References Black H and Nolan J,Black's Law Dictionary(West Pub Co 1990) Elliott C and Quinn F,English Legal System(Longman 2000) Endlich G,A Commentary On The Interpretations Of Statutes(Lawbook Exchange 2005) Katzmann R,Judging Statutes(Oxford University Press 2014) Leyland P,The Constitution Of The United Kingdom(Hart Publishing 2007) Lloyd of Hampstead D and Freeman M,Lloyd's Introduction To Jurisprudence(Stevens 1985) Ratnapala S,Jurisprudence(Cambridge University Press 2009) Riddall J,Jurisprudence(Butterworths 1991) Solan L,The Language Of Statutes(University of Chicago Press 2010) Becke v Smith(1836) 2 MW Conway v Rimmer[1968] UKHL Grey v Pearson(1857) 10 ER Heydon's Case(1584) 76 ER Pepper v Hart(1992) 3 WLR R (Jackson) v Attorney General[2005] UKHL Sigsworth, Re, Bedford v Bedford(1935) 2 MW Sussex Peerage Case(1844) 11 ClFin Whiteley v Chappel(1868) LR 4 QB